There is a clear indication that the man in this meme is confused, angry or annoyed with the argument he is reading. It is unclear, however, whether the argument is based upon persuading the other or not, but we do know there are two parties. Even though this is not the typical form of argumentation throughout rhetoric, the reaction is still valid.
When arguing or attempting to persuade someone else, this reaction of the audience is something persuaders should try to avoid. When this is their reaction, they are not being sent in a positive direction when it comes to believing what you believe. Typically, persuaders want their audience to be happy with what is presented to them, so that there is a better chance of them turning their minds around. When they are unhappy, upset or confused with the presentation, they are not likely to change their beliefs.
This is why using Aristotle's three tools of Ethos can be crucial when persuading. Sharing the audiences' values, having practical wisdom and keeping the audience interested are key to your audiences' minds.
I feel like no one wants to see this face face during an argument. It means you have officially confused me and are not winning this argument at this point. I also think using Aristotles tools will help you not receive this face.
ReplyDeleteI think it is neat seeing example of rhetoric expressed through memes. I think that the use of memes really captures our generations attention and therefore can be used as tools to express rhetoric in an unique form.
ReplyDeleteThat is very effective to get the audience on your side before you persuade them. If they are strongly against you, they are more focused on their emotions rather than listening to you, which makes it hard to change their minds.
ReplyDelete